Salpingectomy

Salpingectomy
Schematic frontal view of female anatomy
ICD-9-CM66.4-66.6
MeSHD058994

Salpingectomy is the surgical removal of one or both fallopian tubes, typically in the context of ectopic pregnancy, cancer—typically ovarian cancer—treatment and prevention, and as a form of contraception.[1][2][3][4]

Salpingectomy is sometimes preferred over its ovarian tube-sparing counterparts because it provides a greater reduction in individuals' risk of ectopic pregnancy.[5] For contraceptive purposes, the procedure is more or less an irreversible form of sterilization and more effective than tubal ligation, which can be surgically reversed.[6]

Classification

Salpingectomy differs from and predates both salpingostomy and salpingotomy. The latter two terms are often used interchangeably and refer to constructing an opening in the fallopian tube to, for example, remove an ectopic pregnancy, but the tube itself is not removed.[7] Technically, the surgical construction of a tubal opening (Latin: os, 'mouth') is a salpingostomy, and incision into the tube to terminate an ectopic pregnancy is a salpingotomy.

Indications

Salpingectomy was performed by Lawson Tait in 1883 in women with a bleeding ectopic pregnancy; it is now established as a routine and lifesaving procedure. Other indications for a salpingectomy include infected tubes (as in a hydrosalpinx) or as part of the surgical procedure for tubal cancer.

A bilateral salpingectomy will lead to sterility, and was used for that purpose; however, less invasive, possibly reversible procedures have become available as tubal occlusion procedures. Bilateral salpingectomies continue to be requested by some voluntarily childfree people over tubal ligation because it reduces the risk of developing cancer; this is called prophylactic salpingectomy.[8] It can be performed non-electively on women who are at a high risk of developing ovarian cancer, as a preventative measure.

Process

Salpingectomy has traditionally been done via a laparotomy; more recently however, laparoscopic salpingectomies have become more common as part of minimally invasive surgery. The tube is severed at the point where it enters the uterus and along its mesenteric edge with hemostatic control.

Salpingo-oophorectomy

Salpingectomy is commonly done as part of a procedure called a salpingo-oophorectomy, in which one or both ovaries, as well as one or both fallopian tubes, are removed in one operation (a bilateral salpingo-oophorectomy (BSO) if both ovaries and fallopian tubes are removed). If a BSO is combined with an abdominal hysterectomy (there are different methods of hysterectomy available), the procedure is commonly called a TAH-BSO: total abdominal hysterectomy with a bilateral salpingo-oophorectomy. Sexual intercourse remains possible after salpingectomy, surgical and radiological cancer treatments, and chemotherapy. Reconstructive surgery remains an option for women who have experienced benign and malignant conditions.[9] :1020–1348

History

Salpingectomies were performed in the United States in the early 20th century in accordance with eugenics legislation. From Buck v. Bell (1927):

The Virginia statute providing for the sexual sterilization of inmates of institutions supported by the State who shall be found to be afflicted with an hereditary form of insanity or imbecility, is within the power of the State under the Fourteenth Amendment.[10]

Buck v. Bell, while not expressly overturned, was implicitly overturned by Skinner v. Oklahoma (1942), in which the Court held that a person's choices whether to aid in the propagation of the human species was a cognizable fundamental right guaranteed under the 14th Amendment of the Constitution, a liberty retained by the people under the 9th Amendment of the Constitution.

See also

References

  1. Yen, Ju-Chuan; Wu, Tzu-I; Stone, Rebecca; Wang, Tian-Li; Visvanathan, Kala; Chen, Li-Ying; Hsu, Min-Huei; Shih, Ie-Ming (30 April 2024). "Salpingectomy for ectopic pregnancy reduces ovarian cancer risk—a nationwide study" (PDF). JNCI Cancer Spectrum. 8 (3) pkae027. doi:10.1093/jncics/pkae027. ISSN 2515-5091. PMC 11078587. PMID 38588567. Retrieved 21 September 2025.
  2. Marino, Sarah; Canela, Christinne D.; Jenkins, Suzanne M.; Nama, Noor (16 February 2024). "Tubal Sterilization". StatPearls Publishing. PMID 29262077. Retrieved 21 September 2025.
  3. Wagar, Matthew K.; Forlines, Grayson L.; Moellman, Nicholas; Carlson, Anisa; Matthews, Michael; Williams, Makeba (1 April 2023). "Postpartum Opportunistic Salpingectomy Compared With Bilateral Tubal Ligation After Vaginal Delivery for Ovarian Cancer Risk Reduction: A Cost-Effectiveness Analysis". Obstetrics and Gynecology. 141 (4): 819–827. doi:10.1097/AOG.0000000000005118. ISSN 1873-233X. PMID 36897130.
  4. Szender, J. B.; Lele, S. B. (1 September 2015). "Fallopian Tube Ligation or Salpingectomy as Means for Reducing Risk of Ovarian Cancer" (PDF). AMA Journal of Ethics. 17 (9): 843–848. doi:10.1001/journalofethics.2015.17.9.stas1-1509. ISSN 2376-6980. PMC 4668199. PMID 26390206. Retrieved 21 September 2025.
  5. Peterson, Herbert B.; Xia, Zhisen; Hughes, Joyce M.; Wilcox, Lynne S.; Tylor, Lisa Ratliff; Trussell, James (13 March 1997). "The Risk of Ectopic Pregnancy after Tubal Sterilization". New England Journal of Medicine. 336 (11): 762–767. doi:10.1056/NEJM199703133361104. ISSN 0028-4793. PMID 9052654.
  6. Mills, Kerry; Marchand, Greg; Sainz, Katelyn; Azadi, Ali; Ware, Kelly; Vallejo, Janelle; Anderson, Sienna; King, Alexa; Osborn, Asya; Ruther, Stacy; Brazil, Giovanna; Cieminski, Kaitlynne; Hopewell, Sophia; Rials, Lisa; Klipp, Angela (2021). "Salpingectomy vs tubal ligation for sterilization: a systematic review and meta-analysis". American Journal of Obstetrics and Gynecology. 224 (3): 258–265.e4. doi:10.1016/j.ajog.2020.09.011. ISSN 1097-6868. PMID 32941790.
  7. Pal L, Parkash V, Rutherford TJ (2003). "Omental trophoblastic implants and hemoperitoneum after laparoscopic salpingostomy for ectopic pregnancy. A case report". The Journal of Reproductive Medicine. 48 (1): 57–9. PMID 12611098.
  8. Kwon, Janice S.; Tinker, Anna; Pansegrau, Gary; McAlpine, Jessica; Housty, Melissa; McCullum, Mary; Gilks, C. Blake (January 2013). "Prophylactic Salpingectomy and Delayed Oophorectomy as an Alternative for BRCA Mutation Carriers". Obstetrics & Gynecology. 121 (1): 14–24. doi:10.1097/aog.0b013e3182783c2f. PMID 23232752. S2CID 41081248.
  9. Hoffman, Barbara (2012). Williams gynecology (2nd ed.). New York: McGraw-Hill Medical. p. 65. ISBN 978-0071716727.
  10. Buck v. Bell