The number of new cases a year is estimated at 2–14 per million people in Europe.[1] In the United States about 3 per 100,000 people are affect.[9] Onset is most often between the age of 40 and 60.[2] Males and females are affected with similar frequency.[2] GPA is rare in Japanese and African-American populations.[10] While the condition was first described in 1931 by Heinz Klinger, it was not identified as a separate condition until 1936 by Friedrich Wegener.[3]
Signs and symptoms
Typical saddle nose damage due to granulomatosis with polyangiitis.Lip ulceration in GAP[11]
Ears: conductive hearing loss due to auditory tube dysfunction, sensorineural hearing loss (unclear mechanism)
Oral cavity: strawberry gingivitis, underlying bone destruction with loosening of teeth, non-specific ulcerations throughout the lining of the mouth[17]
Lungs: pulmonary nodules (referred to as "coin lesions"), infiltrates (often interpreted as pneumonia), cavitary lesions, bleeding in the lungs causing a person to cough up blood, and rarely bronchial stenosis.
The cause of GPA is unknown, although microbes, such as bacteria and viruses, as well as genetics have been implicated in its pathogenesis.[13][18]
Pathophysiology
Classic microscopic features of GPA include inflammation of blood vessels associated with poorly formed granulomas, necrosis, and many giant cells.[19] Bacterial colonization with Staphylococcus aureus has been hypothesized as an initiating factor of the autoimmunity seen in people with GPA.[6] Several genes involved in the immune system including PTPN22, CTLA4, and human leukocyte antigen genes may influence the risk of developing GPA.[10]
It is now widely presumed that the anti-neutrophil cytoplasmic antibodies (ANCAs) are responsible for the inflammation in GPA.[12] The typical ANCAs in GPA are those that react with proteinase 3, an enzyme prevalent in neutrophil granulocytes.[10]In vitro studies have found that ANCAs can activate neutrophils, increase their adherence to endothelium, and induce their degranulation that can damage endothelial cells. In theory, this phenomenon could cause extensive damage to the vessel wall, in particular of arterioles.[12]
Diagnosis
Immunofluorescence pattern produced by binding of ANCA to ethanol-fixed neutrophils, from a person with GPA
Granulomatosis with polyangiitis is usually suspected only when a person has had unexplained symptoms for a long period of time. Determination of anti-neutrophil cytoplasmic antibodies (ANCAs) can aid in the diagnosis, but positivity is not conclusive and negative ANCAs are not sufficient to reject the diagnosis. More than 90% of people who have GPA test positive for ANCA.[19] Cytoplasmic-staining ANCAs that react with the enzyme proteinase 3 (cANCA) in neutrophils (a type of white blood cell) are associated with GPA.[12] Involvement of the ears, nose, and throat is more common in granulomatosis with polyangiitis than in the similar condition microscopic polyangiitis.[10]
If the person has signs of kidney involvement or cutaneous vasculitis, a biopsy is obtained from the kidneys. On rare occasions, thoracoscopic lung biopsy is required. On histopathological examination, a biopsy will show leukocytoclastic vasculitis with necrotic changes and granulomatousinflammation (clumps of typically arranged white blood cells) on microscopy. These granulomas are the main reason for the name granulomatosis with polyangiitis, although it is not an essential feature. Nevertheless, necrotizing granulomas are a hallmark of this disease. However, many biopsies can be nonspecific and 50% provide too little information for the diagnosis of GPA.[12]
Classification
Granulomatosis with polyangiitis is part of a larger group of vasculitic syndromes called systemic vasculitides or necrotizing vasculopathies, all of which feature an autoimmune attack by an abnormal type of circulating antibody termed ANCAs (antineutrophil cytoplasmic antibodies) against small and medium-size blood vessels. Apart from GPA, this category includes eosinophilic granulomatosis with polyangiitis (EGPA) and microscopic polyangiitis.[7] Although GPA affects small- and medium-size vessels,[20] it is formally classified as one of the small vessel vasculitides in the Chapel Hill system.[21]
Photo showing the sclerokeratitis associated with GPAwithin the arterial wall or
in the perivascular area
According to the Chapel Hill Consensus Conference (CHCC) on the nomenclature of systemic vasculitis (1992), establishing the diagnosis of GPA demands:[23]
a granulomatous inflammation involving the respiratory tract, and
Oral and intravenous cyclophosphamide are both effective for induction of GPA remission. Oral cyclophosphamide at a dose of 2 mg/kg/day was the standard treatment for many years; this regimen resulted in complete remission in more than 75% of people with GPA but is associated with significant toxicities including infertility, inflammation and bleeding from the bladder, and bladder cancer.[6] In contrast, administering pulsed doses of intravenous cyclophosphamide is equally effective for inducing remission, results in a lower cumulative dose, and decreases the incidence of abnormally low white blood cell counts by one-third.[6] However, pulsed intravenous cyclophosphamide may be associated with a higher risk of GPA relapse when compared to oral cyclophosphamide.[6] Due to a high frequency of abnormally low white blood cell counts seen with cyclophosphamide treatment, Pneumocystis jirovecii pneumonia is a common complication and prophylaxis against this pathogen is recommended.[6]
Rituximab may be substituted for cyclophosphamide to induce remission since it is similarly effective and has a comparable side effect profile.[25][28] The dose of corticosteroids is generally tapered (decreased) very slowly over the course of several months to reduce the risk of another GPA flare. After a person with GPA has successfully undergone induction and gone into remission, the treatment goal then shifts to maintenance of remission and preventing subsequent GPA flares. Less toxic immunosuppressing medications such as rituximab, methotrexate, azathioprine, leflunomide, or mycophenolate mofetil are used.[29]TNF inhibitors, such as etanercept, appear to be ineffective and are not recommended for routine use.[6]
Limited disease
In generalized non-organ-threatening disease, remission can be achieved with a combination of methotrexate and corticosteroids, where the steroid dose is reduced after a remission has been achieved and methotrexate is used as maintenance therapy. Treatment measures for localised GPA of the nose and sinuses includes nasal irrigation, nasal corticosteroids, and antibiotics if infection occurs.[14] If perforation of the nasal septum occurs (or saddle nose deformity), then surgical repair is recommended.[14]
Trimethoprim/sulfamethoxazole has been proposed to help prevent relapse though a 2015 Cochrane review did not confirm fewer relapses with trimethoprim/sulfamethoxazole treatment.[6][27]
Prognosis
Before modern treatments, the 2-year survival was under 10% and average survival five months.[13][30] Death usually resulted from uremia or respiratory failure.[13] The revised Five-factor score is associated with 5-year mortality from GPA and is based on the following criteria: age greater than 65 years, cardiac symptoms, gastrointestinal involvement, chronic kidney disease, and the absence of ears, nose, and throat symptoms.[10]
With corticosteroids and cyclophosphamide, 5-year survival is over 80%.[13] Long-term complications are common (86%), mainly chronic kidney failure, hearing loss, and deafness.[12] The risk of relapse is increased in people with GPA who test positive for anti-PR3 ANCA antibodies and is higher than the relapse risk for microscopic polyangiitis.[10]
Today, medication toxicity is managed more carefully and long-term remissions are possible. Some affected individuals are able to lead relatively normal lives and remain in remission for 20+ years after treatment.[31]
Epidemiology
The incidence is 10–20 cases per million per year.[32][33] It is exceedingly rare in Japan and in African Americans.[33]
History
Scottish otolaryngologist Peter McBride (1854–1946) first described the condition in 1897 in a BMJ article entitled "Photographs of a case of rapid destruction of the nose and face".[34] Heinz Karl Ernst Klinger (born 1907) added information on the anatomical pathology. An early name for the disease was pathergic granulomatosis.[35] The disease is still sometimes confused with lethal midline granuloma and lymphomatoid granulomatosis, both malignant lymphomas.[36]
The full clinical picture was first presented by Friedrich Wegener (1907–1990), a German pathologist, in two reports in 1936 and 1939, leading to the eponymous name Wegener's granulomatosis or Wegener granulomatosis (English: /ˈvɛɡənər/).[9]
In 2006, Alexander Woywodt (Preston, United Kingdom) and Eric Matteson (Mayo Clinic, US) investigated Wegener's past, and discovered that he was, at least at some point of his career, a follower of the Nazi regime. He was a member of the Sturmabteilung paramilitary group and worked in an office where medical experiments were conducted on Jewish people.[37] In addition, their research indicate that Wegener was wanted by Polish authorities and that his files were forwarded to the United Nations War Crimes Commission. Furthermore, Wegener worked in close proximity to the genocide machinery in Łódź. Their research raised serious concerns about Wegener's professional conduct. They suggested that the eponym be abandoned and proposed "ANCA-associated granulomatous vasculitis" as an alternative name.[38] The authors have since campaigned for other medical eponyms to be abandoned as well.[39] In 2011, the American College of Rheumatology (ACR), the American Society of Nephrology (ASN) and the European League Against Rheumatism (EULAR) resolved to change the name to granulomatosis with polyangiitis.[40] The old name remains widely used despite the consensus to adopt the change.[37]
↑ 7.07.1Singer, O; McCune, WJ (May 2017). "Update on maintenance therapy for granulomatosis with polyangiitis and microscopic polyangiitis". Current Opinion in Rheumatology (Review). 29 (3): 248–53. doi:10.1097/BOR.0000000000000382. PMID 28306595. S2CID 35805200.
↑Walters, GD; Willis, NS; Cooper, TE; Craig, JC (13 January 2020). "Interventions for renal vasculitis in adults". The Cochrane database of systematic reviews. 1: CD003232. doi:10.1002/14651858.CD003232.pub4. PMID 31927782.
↑ 9.09.1Pakalniskis, MG; Berg, AD; Policeni, BA; Gentry, LR; Sato, Y; Moritani, T; Smoker, WR (December 2015). "The Many Faces of Granulomatosis With Polyangiitis: A Review of the Head and Neck Imaging Manifestations". AJR. American Journal of Roentgenology (Review). 205 (6): W619–29. doi:10.2214/AJR.14.13864. PMID 26587951.
↑ 10.010.110.210.310.410.510.6Millet, A; Pederzoli-Ribeil, M; Guillevin, L; Witko-Sarsat, V; Mouthon, L (August 2013). "Antineutrophil cytoplasmic antibody-associated vasculitides: is it time to split up the group?". Annals of the Rheumatic Diseases (Review). 72 (8): 1273–9. doi:10.1136/annrheumdis-2013-203255. PMID 23606701. S2CID 206849855.
↑ 13.013.113.213.313.4Berden A, Göçeroglu A, Jayne D, Luqmani R, Rasmussen N, Bruijn JA, Bajema I (January 2012). "Diagnosis and management of ANCA associated vasculitis". BMJ. 344: e26. doi:10.1136/bmj.e26. PMID 22250224. S2CID 206894936.
↑ 14.014.114.214.314.4Kuan, EC; Suh, JD (February 2017). "Systemic and Odontogenic Etiologies in Chronic Rhinosinusitis". Otolaryngologic Clinics of North America (Review). 50 (1): 95–111. doi:10.1016/j.otc.2016.08.008. PMID 27888918.
↑Papaliodis, GN (November 2017). "Ophthalmologic manifestations of systemic vasculitis". Current Opinion in Ophthalmology (Review). 28 (6): 613–16. doi:10.1097/ICU.0000000000000422. PMID 28817388. S2CID 36254262.
↑Marzano, AV; Balice, Y; Tavecchio, S; Desimine, C; Colombo, A; Berti, E (April 2015). "Granulomatous vasculitis". Giornale Italiano di Dermatologia e Venereologia (Review). 150 (2): 193–202. PMID 25791629.
↑Tracy, CL; Papadopoulos, PJ; Bye, MR; Connolly, H; Goldberg, E; O'Brian, RJ; Sharma, GD; Talavera, F; Toder, DS; Valentini, RP; Windle, ML; Wolf, RE (10 February 2014). Diamond, HS (ed.). "Granulomatosis with Polyangiitis". Medscape Reference. WebMD. Archived from the original on 15 July 2021. Retrieved 16 March 2014.
↑ 19.019.1Chen, JH; Deshpande, V (June 2017). "IgG4-related Disease and the Liver". Gastroenterology Clinics of North America (Review). 46 (2): 195–216. doi:10.1016/j.gtc.2017.01.001. PMID 28506361.
↑ 33.033.1Cartin-Ceba R, Peikert T, Specks U (December 2012). "Pathogenesis of ANCA-associated vasculitis". Current Rheumatology Reports. 14 (6): 481–93. doi:10.1007/s11926-012-0286-y. PMID 22927039. S2CID 12082375.
↑Friedmann I (January 1982). "McBride and the midfacial granuloma syndrome. (The second 'McBride Lecture', Edinburgh, 1980)". The Journal of Laryngology and Otology. 96 (1): 1–23. doi:10.1017/s0022215100092197. PMID 7057076.
↑Fienberg R (December 1955). "Pathergic granulomatosis". The American Journal of Medicine. 19 (6): 829–31. doi:10.1016/0002-9343(55)90150-9. PMID 13275478.